Welcome to MythsAmerica. Our objectives are:
1)to share ideas, reactions and thoughts and counterpoints on current events and on the often unilateral and revisionist interpretations of facts and history
2) To stimulate and exchange constructive, challenging and stimulating dialogue
3) To promote constructive, meaningful action for a more peace oriented, more just world

Thursday, May 3, 2012

IN ITALY,
IT IS TIME TO TAKE ACTION; THE PEOPLE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF A CORRUPT GOVERNMENT THAT SERVES ONLY THE WISHES OF THE RICH; VISIT #AGIAMOSUBITO ON TWITTER. WE ARE COMMITTED TO CHANGING THE WAY THINGS ARE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMON PERSON, FOR A MORE JUST, MORE EQUITABLE, MORE FAIR ITALY!
#agiamosubito we will not be silent!

Thursday, January 26, 2012

In Italy, Non Tutto e' "Made in China" !

by Prof. Maurizio Morselli, Business English Trainer





Sento frequentemente che ormai anche nel nostro stupendo e creativo paese e' "quasi tutto fatto in Cina'. Credo sia necessario informarsi meglio e sapere che alcuni importanti e costosissimi prodotti(quindi ad alto profitto) , sono ancora "Made in Italy"e sono fortissimi! Il quotidiano “Haaretz” rivela  che le forze armate israeliane starebbero per assegnare all’industria bellica italiana la commessa di oltre un miliardo di dollari per la fornitura di 25-30 caccia-addestratori “avanzati”. Infatti gli M-346 Italiani, frutto di grande ricerca e investimento tecnico, sostituiranno i vecchi A-4 “Skyhawk” della statunitense McDonnell Douglas, utilizzati dalle “Tigri volanti” del 102° squadrone dell’aeronautica israeliana. Pensate un po'! I nostri aerei da guerra piu' avanzati di quelli USA !
La comunicazione ufficiale del ministero della Difesa è attesa per i prossimi giorni, ma il direttore generale, Udi Shadi, avrebbe già firmato un accordo preliminare con i manager di Alenia Aermacchi durante una sua recente visita in Italia. Inoltre, entro la fine del 2013, i grandi aerei da trasporto della nostra aeronautica C27J e C130 e gli elicotteri Eh101 cominceranno ad essere equipaggiati con il sistema di contromisure a raggi infrarossi “DIRCM” (Directional Infrared Countermeasures) co-prodotto dalla italiana “Elettronica” e dalla israeliana “Elbit”. Il contratto comporterà una spesa di 25,4 milioni di euro. Siamo bravi, no?  Il "Made in Italy" (e non "in Cina) continua a colpire importanti bersagli. Questa maestosa bravura, grazie ai notevoli investimenti e diligente ricerca e innovazione, ci rende naturalmente, competitivissimi nei lucrosi campi della DISTRUZIONE. Peccato che, sfortunatamente, non si trovino mai i fondi necessari per investire e quindi renderci piu' competitivi nei produttivi e umani campi della CREAZIONE: campi quali la ricerca, innovazione didattica, arte, creativita', evoluzione delle politiche sociali ed eliminazione della miriade di superflue e controproducenti politiche burocratiche.
Puo' anche darsi che questi ultimi meno "aggressivi" investimenti siano considerati cianfrusaglie,  sulle quali non possiamo perder tempo a investire talento nostrano. Quindi non mi sorprenderebbe se per queste "cianfrusaglie"   ci rivolgessimo un di' alla Cina.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

New American Idioms. This month’s idiom : “NOT MUCH”, compliments of a presidential candidate

Mitt Romney and Colleagues displaying their core motivational factors.  
WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney has a new definition of "not much": $374,327.00 .
On Tuesday, the Republican presidential candidate finally admitted that the effective tax rate he has been paying for the last several years is likely well below that of middle-class workers.
In Greenville, S.C., Romney was asked directly what his effective tax rate is. It was a hot topic of discussion at Monday night's debate, at which Romney repeatedly declined to fully commit to release his tax returns.
"It's probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything," said Romney on Tuesday. "For the past 10 years, my income comes overwhelmingly from investments made in the past, rather than ordinary income or earned annual income. I got a little bit of income from my book, but I gave that all away. Then, I get speakers fees from time to time, but not very much."
Not very much? According to his personal financial disclosure, from February 2010 to February 2011, Romney earned $374,327.62 in speaking fees. A few months later, Romney joked that he was "unemployed."
His rival, Newt Gingrich, said that he made $60,000 per speech -- defending himself against the charge that he served as a lobbyist for Freddie Mac, for which he was paid over $1.6 million for strategic advice.
Romney has an estimated wealth of between $190 million to $250 million, according to financial disclosure reports. Upon leaving Bain Capital in 1999, he negotiated a retirement package guaranteeing him a percentage of the firm's profits.
A single worker who earns more than $35,350 in income pays a 25 percent tax rate on earnings above that amount. Many families that earn less than $100,000 per year pay an effective rate of just above that, according to the Congressional Research Service.
The Huffington Post's Jon Ward asked Romney about his tax rate in Iowa last December. "You take advantage of the opportunity to be in America, to build a bright future, and you pay your taxes as required by law," he said. "And if something is a capital gain, it should be treated as a capital gain. If something is ordinary income, it should be treated as ordinary income. And the determination of those things has been made by Congress and by the courts and by the Internal Revenue Service. I've always followed the law as to the taxes that we've paid, my wife and I have paid."

Romney's wealthy welfare comes from a loophole in the tax code that taxes long-term capital gains at a 15 percent rate. Private equity executives are then "paid" with capital gains instead of regular income. The executives, such as Romney, then tell the Internal Revenue Service that they were not being reimbursed a salary for work they performed but instead were merely investors reaping the rewards of risk taking. Happily for the executives, any investments that go belly up and lead to bankruptcy and mass layoffs can be counted against the earnings, which amounts to a tax subsidy for failed projects.
Should someone who considers "occasional speaker’s fees" of $ 374,327.00, “not much”, have the privilege to represent 99% of US Citizens, many of whom have an annual salary of 1/100th of what he considers “not much” ?
This story has been updated to reflect Romney's speaking fees according to his financial disclosure.
edited for brevity by  M. Morselli

Saturday, December 17, 2011

LIP JOB

Did You ever Notice that ALL Liars have the same THIN Lips?.... Just an Observation...

LET FREEDOM RING

Monday, October 24, 2011

AT LAST THE PEOPLE HAVE COME AROUND: Watch this video


We promote democracy everywhere else but at home we arrest peaceful protesters. It's not right and we will no longer be silent.

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dntZZe9h84>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dntZZe9h84AT LAST

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

ROME- OCTOBER 15TH:---HOW POWER HIJACKS US! IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. DO NOT BE SILENT

The most shocking aspect of Saturday’s riot in Rome was the fact that it did not come as a shock. For 10 years now in Italy, at least since the violence at Genoa’s G8 in 2001, there has been the strong possibility of protest marches being hijacked by relatively small numbers of very well organised, well prepared thugs. One can speculate about who are the master puppetteers of the so called "thugs"...?
> Is it orchestrated by the law enforcement authorities who guide this
> Do the law enforcement authorities allow these independent thughs to do their dirty work
> Or are they just stealth organized fringes who do deliver distruction for the sake of vandalism?
No one seems to know... but wat we do know is what happens.
It happened in Rome last year after the 14 December vote of confidence and for the whole of last week, all the papers were talking about the likelihood of violence on Saturday. I have no special sources but from very public ones, it was obvious to warn my American students wanting to show some solidarity with the “Occupy Wall St.” protest to be very careful as there were plenty of signs that something nasty was going to happen. As it happened, they were careful but they did come back with some good primary material for the course on political violence…
Yet both the organisers and the police had made no plans to deal with what was a very effective takeover of the whole demo. Most Italian demonstrations have their own servizio d’ordine, a group of people from the organisers who see that none of their own people cause trouble. Trades unions and more established protest movements have a long experience of managing crowds and acting as buffers between the demonstrators and the police or public. This time the organisers very explicitly had no internal security. When the violence began, there were many spontaneous attempts to contain it but mostly they didn’t stand a chance against well prepared and disciplined spoilers. One 52 year old tried to stop a gang starting on a bank, and lost two fingers from a hand; in another area, there was the paradox of the usually radical and anti-police, anti-establishment left wing Cobas getting help from the celerini, the riot police normally their antagonists.
On the other side, the different police forces were badly prepared, low on morale and in the wrong places. It could hardly have been worse. The close control and divisory tactics that other police forces have developed were not used on Saturday. There is footage of carabinieri, police or finance guards (the three main national police forces, all of whom were present), standing around in the midst of the melée uncertain of what to do next. Like other police forces, though, the Italian ones have had to deal with swingeing cuts in their budgets and like the British at least, they have been accused of being heavy handed in the past (and some suffered either financially or in their careers) so many were afraid of being too aggressive. Finally, the majority was deployed around the sensitive areas in the centre (Parliament, ministries, Berlusconi’s residence) rather than with the demonstrators so that when the violence began there were no police.
Those were the tactical errors. There have been much more longterm mistakes made too.
It is axiomatic that economic hardship increases social tension and might lead to violence. Some politicians and commentators have been warning government of the dangers for months. Antonio Di Pietro and the deputy and journalist Furio Colombo clamour like Cassandra. The response has been to accuse them of encouraging violence.
The clear message from the demonstrations across the world was that banks and governments had either misbehaved or been incompetent and that the young in particular were not prepared to give up their futures for others’ crimes or stupidity. Their expectations have been crushed and they are angry.
But on Saturday all the demonstrations apart from Rome were peaceful and here, the vast majority was peaceful and furious that a few had stolen the show.
Those few are usually referred to as the Black Block as if it was a single organisation. They aren’t – they are small numbers of mostly young people, mostly male who use left wing usually anarchist rhetoric and fascist methods. They use black block techniques developed and tried in Germany and elsewhere over the last 25 years; according to one interviewed in La Repubblica this morning, they have used the Greek unrest as a training camp. Wherever they learnt, they are extremely effective. Calm and unworried as they hack away at armoured glass or a police vehicle; prepared by donning protective clothing before beginning the mayhem and by leaving caches of molotov cocktails and ball bearing or paving stones – the ubiquitous sanpietrini which can be used as an instantly available missile in most of Rome; careful to destroy CCTVs and warn off cameramen but also sometimes oblivious of the hundreds of cameras around.
Those who are able and prepared to use the violence seen on Saturday are quite able to use more serious violence in terrorist attacks and we can only hope that law enforcement agency will be capable of dealing with the symptoms and more importantly, that government agencies are prepared to address the underlying causes and work with the majority on non-violent protesters.
Not very likely, I fear. The Interior Minister, Roberto Maroni was the only member of government who made a public appreciation of the non-violent protest. The new head of the European Central Bank (and until the end of the month head of the Bank of Italy) Mario Draghi said before the violence began that the protesters had a point.
But the rest of government tried to put all the blame on “the left”. Berlusconi did not go as far as saying that Bersani, Vendola and Di Pietro, the leaders of the main centre-left parties, were responsible but the innuendo was there – and no doubt will continue. Anything to move attention from fundamental economic difficulties.
They will return to the surface soon enough – but so will the prospect of political violence.

From http://italpolblog.blogspot.com/2011/10/flames-in-rome.html